LOL, you are such a hippy, still thinking! I love flouride- yum yum!
I didn't see ya there trans...how ya doing? Long time no see. I'll see if I can find some fluoride lollies to send you...
still thinking
JoinedPosts by still thinking
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
still thinking
When water fluoridation first began in the 1940s, dentists believed that fluoride’s main benefit to teeth came from being swallowed during the tooth-forming years. This belief that fluoride’s primary benefit was “systemic” and “pre-eruptive.” A “systemic” benefit is one that comes from ingesting fluoride, and a “pre-eruptive” benefit is one that occurs by swallowing fluoride before the teeth erupt into the mouth. The premise underlying this belief was that, since ingesting fluoride increased the fluoride content of the teeth, the teeth would be more resistant to decay for life.
Although this “systemic” paradigm was the premise that launched water fluoridation and fluoride supplementation programs, it has now been discarded by the dental research community. Today, as noted by the following studies, the overwhelming consensus by dental researchers is that fluoride’s primary effect is topical, not systemic, and that this topical effect occurs after the teeth have erupted into the mouth (i.e., post-eruptive), not before. There is no need, therefore, to swallow fluoride, especially during infancy and early childhood. As the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) stated in 1999 “fluoride prevents dental caries predominately after eruption of the tooth into the mouth, and its actions primarily are topical for both adults and children.” The National Research Council has concurred, stating in 2006 that “the major anticaries benefit of fluoride is topical and not systemic.”
For a discussion on how fluoride works topically, and how scientists came to disprove the systemic theory, click here.
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
still thinking
WHich city ?
Hamilton
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
still thinking
Most developed nations in the world have rejected fluoridation, including 97% of western Europe. The United States, which fluoridates more than 70% of its water supplies, is an exception to this rule. According to the British Fluoridation Society, there are more people drinking artificially fluoridated water in the United States than all other countries combined.
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
still thinking
I understand you add vitimin A & D to your milk in Canada. As far as I know we don't in NZ. It is added to baby formula though.
still thinking, did you see how many experts endorsed the study that I posted?
Did you notice that except for One 'expert' from Canada and One 'expert' form Mexico ALL the other 'experts' were American?
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
still thinking
jgnat...what do you think about mass medication of society without consent? Does that sound like a democracy?
Still Thinking, you are quite literally insane..Barrold
Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
still thinking
Everything can kill. If you drink too much water you will also die. Everybody dies in the end. YOu have to be more specific
Actually mP...I don't. If the chemical companies insist on adding this to our water THEY have to provide evidence that it is necessary and safe. And interestingly...in a recent local govenment discussion here. They could not. The evidence against fluoridation outweighed the evidence for. And the same thing is happening in Europe. There is not enough good evidence to justify mass medication of the public.
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
still thinking
Do you know mP that there is NO safe way of disposing the fluoride from these chemical companies? We recently had a city in NZ decide that they would no longer use fluoride in the water, based on extensive meetings and evidence presented.
But, they had to use up the supply they already had, in the water....because..."there is no other safe way of disposing it"
Now mP...I ask you, as a reasonable person. Can you see any motive there for chemical companies to want to put it in our water?
Not only do they beneifit from selling it to us...but they benefit by 'safely' disposing of their waste product.
-
136
Water Fluoridation
by still thinking inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2vcgb_pgbte#at=679.
-
-
still thinking
You know, from naturally occurring flouride?
What is added to our water is NOT naturally occuring fluoride. It is a waste product from the pesticide industry. And of course you will find studies to support it. However. The rest of the world fortunately does not just listen to American studies. And they are getting rid of fluoride based on their own studies. Because NO ONE TRUSTS AMERICAN results any more. Their Chemical industry, Pharmaceutical industry, Universities and Government are CONTAMINATED by corporations who seem to enjoy nothing better than poisoning their citizens and citizens of the world providing they make a profit.
When American universities stop being funded by huge corporations like Dow chemicals and Monsanto et el. Lets look at what they have to offer. Until then. The rest of the world is coming to their own conclusion based on studies NOT funded by the companies trying to sell us their chemicals.These same companies who's scientific 'evidence' told us that Agent orange and DDT were safe. And the same government that approved it for use.
Here is the result of American corporations and government departments telling us their products are safe....is this sciency enough for you?
** WARNING: Content may be shocking **
So yeah...American studies don't mean squat to me. And neither does the CDC.
Many additives and food colourings etc are BANNED by most of the world while American government agencies lke the CDC and FDA tell Americans they are safe.
So yeah...lets get all sciencey shall we? Thats what American science and government departments have given the world. Thanks. And if you think this is just a one off mistake. There are PLENTY MORE where that came from. All rubber stamped by the government because all they need is the 'scientific' evidence PROVIDED by the chemical companies themselves to approve its use.
-
34
Freemason Wilbur Ross... buying back Watchtower assets for the Rothschild family
by Calebs Airplane infreemason wilbur ross, a well-connected banking tycoon with strong ties to the rothschild family has just bid on some watchtower buildings in brooklyn... is the watchtower returning assets to their mother organization?.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/ross_for_jehovah_witnesses_bldgs_komlwtyitfqj3e0ly5fsmk.
also, please view this fairly recent interview with forbes magazine... seems carefully scripted on both ends.... http://www.forbes.com/sites/tanyabenedicto/2011/01/31/wilbur-ross-on-the-economy/.
-
-
still thinking
Freemasons are boogeymen!
Thats a good name for bankers and government officials. I like that. The Rothschilds ARE bogey men.